22 February 2009

Creative Piece: Home(wood Field)

     Some Saturdays, the sun just barely peaked through the clouds, but others, it streaked down, bouncing off the metallic bleachers, blinding me, and radiating heat. On these days, the pale blue sky was immaculate, without a blemish, and the hot rays soaked through my skin, warming me to the very bone. The cold, silver benches, naturally dull, glittered and dazzled in the early afternoon light, and a brilliant yellow-orange drenched the players in a cheerful splendor, as they danced down the field. The stadium stood, majestic, and spectacular, in the early April light.
     I sat and watched and listened. My ears filled with the crowd’s exultations, the cheers that emanated from the sea of blue surrounding me. The shrill laughter of the man to my left, a young child’s call, the coach’s constant, deep bellowing seemed to pick up and carry with the light wind, and then trailed off as the wind shifted, and whipped in the opposite direction. The sun scorched the emerald strip of turf that was dotted and lined playfully with thick, criss-crossing, candy stripes. The fresh cut grass, like a neighbor’s lawn, or a baseball game, smelled of early spring and mixed with the pungent odor of spray cans and line paint. The hot, thick, scent of greasy food hung over the bleachers. The stadium often took on that familiar, homey feel that made me feel safe and content and comfortable. Sometimes the sun shone so bright that the whole world was enveloped in a blank, pale, undistinguishable white, like a winter morning when a frosted window reveals the world, wrapped up in a blanket of purity. 

     My hours spent at Homewood field were vibrant, and timeless. Other times, at night games, the sky would open up and the entire world would spill out on top of us. A harsh, punishing, rain would lash across my face, the wind cutting me deeply from within. And other times a monotonous drizzle would continue for hours, rain trickling down, a slow, torturous, rhythm that seemed to push the earth to its breaking point. The harsh and unpredictable conditions called to me, and seemed to test the will and mettle of others who had so contentedly filled the stands on pleasant, breezy mid afternoons. On these evenings, the sky and the fields took on a pale, glassy gray, one of a stormy coastline or a dull sheet-metal, and during those night games, a thick, heavy fog settled under the clouds, rain bogging the field in mud, and weighing the world down, leaving me alone to soak in the darkness and enveloping me in a constant, pervasive chill. Those nights stung the earth, and froze me to the core, as the raw ground cracked under the incredible pressure of the game and the world. As the bleak skies opened up to cutting winds and lightning, God illuminated the sky in a spectacular and awe-inspiring electrical storm, and even in the harsh black, rewarded me for my loyalty and faith, with a mystifying and natural light-show. 

     The most beautiful days, and even the ugliest nights, at Homewood Field amassed God’s utter power and reminded me of my insignificance in His world, of my participation in something wholly greater and more important than me. The bright days and dark nights at the field demanded my happiness and appreciation, and commanded my respect. The stadium filled me with emotions, and yet the stands always held among them the resounding thunder of the divine, and carried the resilient quality of victory, ensuring me that the stadium would always be as it was then, powerful and unchanging, and eternal.

16 February 2009

Does Unconventionality Even Exist Anymore?

resemblance?
     Even if it is just the makeup, the manscaped eyebrows, the heavily "product"ed hair, and the piercing blue eyes, there's something a little upsetting about the very apparent resemblance between Ian Somerhalder, Chace Crawford, and Zac Efron. Each actor appeals to a decidedly different demographic, but they all look wildly similar. Zac may do it for the preteens, and Chace for Gossip Girl fanatics, but Ian is just an older version, for the more mature viewers who watched LOST back in its first season. They're even wearing similar shirts, and often bear the same facial expression. Yes Boone's look has the hardened effect of a plane crash survivor, and Zac's the same borderline suggestiveness of his High School Musical scenes, where he appears in the locker room shirtless to get a pep talk from his dad or psyche himself up for the big game. Nevertheless, these three are the perfect example of society's narrow-mindedness and our obsession with uninteresting, boring, conventional beauty. I find it at times utterly tiring and frustrating, yet widely fascinating, that we all have such similar ideas of beauty and standards for what beauty is. I think it is so incredible how we have been instructed to find certain people attractive, or have been attracted to certain people instinctively, and not others. I buy into this too, and it isn't always necessarily a bad thing, but why is Zac's, Ian's, and Chace's look so popular. Why is is so attractive? Why does it sell? Why is it preferred (generally) to a more unique looking person? 
     Social and generational trends and themes are constantly changing, and constantly interesting. Why is it that teasing redheads, or gingers, has become such a marker of our generation? Why do certain genres of film, TV, and novels go in and out of style? Why do values change? Does it take an increasingly progressive mind or political stance to stay open to such generational shifts? The Who certainly didn't care who was open to change and who wasn't. Why do certain pieces of clothing, celebrities, music tastes, and political philosophies come back into style, while others vanish? Why is Bruce Springsteen THE MAN again, after all these years? Dictionary.com defines generation as, "a group of individuals, most of whom are the same approximate age, having similar ideas, problems, attitudes, etc." Each age group in the United States's history has been given a generational title, classified with generational accomplishments or characteristics. From the Lost Generation to Tom Brokaw's The Greatest Generation, from my parents' Baby Boom Generation, to Obama's Generation Jones (55-64). Are generations, and the age groups with whom we associate great determiners as we develop our world views and personal tastes? If so, how does generationalism also promote such distinct differences as it did in 1960's politics. All of those men, members of the GI Generation, served in WWII together, and shared common pasts, common goals. Yet in the midst of new generations, of war protests, and hippies, and flower children, this older generation met a great schism that has persisted and consequentially divided subsequent generations. Do generations provide for the same amount of social diversity as they do political differences? 
     If diversity does still exist, which I believe it does, I must also believe it is the desire to be a part of something greater, something memorable, something identifiable that drives our willingness to be categorized. Our compliance in being meshed together in a 10 second Pepsi commercial that uses three, brief, stereotypical clips to capture millions and millions of people. It is pretty incredible how different everyone is, but also how similar, and how willing to make connections with others, establish some sort of legacy or reputation, find common ground. Now, for our nation's sake, wouldn't it be nice if we could adapt this viewpoint to our politics?

08 February 2009

Johns Hopkins Lacrosse Season Preview: "We Just Wanna Lax."

     This was what the Duke lacrosse squad chanted while waiting in the wings of Gillette Stadium last may, after a sensational semifinal match between Virginia and Syracuse, who won in overtime. Eager to take the field, the Duke team had no idea what was coming. What came was a shocking upset, courtesy of the team that at midseason looked like it would be lucky to reach .500. The Dukies' enthusiasm was charming (as charming as one can be when you're from Durham and wear that dreaded shade of blue) but they had another thing coming. His name? Paul Rabil. Dave Pietramala and his Blue Jays masterfully crafted a come-from-behind, last minute victory, that would send them soaring into Monday's finals. Cue the highlight reel for  Kevin Huntley's behind the back goal.
      They ended up losing on Monday, to the evil nemesis, Syracuse. There, to me, is no more hated lacrosse program than that that has housed Gary Gait, Casey, Mike, and Ryan Powell. Oh, and Brett Bucktooth. Anyways, I did not stop crying the whole way back to Baltimore, and then some. But I was not just upset that Hopkins had lost. I was heartbroken that I had just witnessed Paul Rabil's last college game, his last game in that uniform, his last game playing for Petro, and he had not been able to go out on his own terms. Sure he scored 5 goals, or maybe six, the memory's fuzzy, but personal accolades are nothing to Paul. As a Blue Jay, it was not about him; it was about the team. 
     And now Rabil is gone. Drafted off to the Boston Cannons, as the MLL's number one pick. Gone is Doneger. Gone is Huntley. Gone is Bocklet. Gone is Peyser. Four All-Americans, countless other contributors. We now look to the new season, beginning in just two weeks, and we are full of questions. Will Gvozden be able to step up, or rather out, once again, and make the same crucial saves he had last season? Will Evans and Drenan take charge of a young defense and can Mike Kimmel become the next Paul Rabil? Apparently the new team chant is "Step Up," and the boys in blue will definitely need to keep this motto in mind. It could be a rocky season, or a great one. But one thing is certain; Dave Pietramala never ceases to surprise. Last season, the Blue Jays suffered an embarrassing losing streak, capped off by a blowout win for North Carolina on Hopkins' own turf. Yet they charged back, making it to the finals, and slashing past Duke, who had already stamped its plane tickets to Cabo for a celebration vacation. 
      Criticism and pessimism is everywhere, and analysts, fans, the media, think the impossible certainly will not be done. But Hopkins has graduated great players before. In recent years, Hopkins has lost Jake Byrne, Jesse Schwartzman, and even Kyle Harrison, who is in my opinion the greatest player of all-time. Each year, the Johns Hopkins lacrosse team perseveres, and has made it to the finals the past two years. 
     Look for Steven Boyle, the returning leading scorer, to help Kimmel run the attack, and Matt Dolente to continue his dominance at midfield, ensuring possession. Brian Cristopher is consistently strengthening and will help garner the midfield. We can also expect great contributions from rising stars Mark Bryan, Sam DeVore, and Tommy Duerr. Struggling Siena and Princeton teams at the top of Hopkins' schedule provide potential wins to start off the season.
       The main problem is not what these younger players are capable of doing, but it is whether or not they can continue to do what they do without Peyser to take the draw, or Rabil to snatch an iffy pass and finish for a goal. Without Doneger's dependability or a feed from Huntley. Without power attackers, the offense will have to shift its approach, and will rely on transition rather than Paul Rabil's power packages. As of now, no Blue Jay is dominant enough to take on two, or even three defenders, on his own during a man up situation. If Hopkins is successful in this transition approach, however, they will make it far for the third consecutive season. Before further analysis, I may need to watch a few games, but my feelings are that Pietramala and his boys could well be knocking at the door of another playoff run. 
     This season will separate the true fans from the fair weather fans, and the weak from the brave at heart, both on the field and off. It may be a roller coaster of a year, but that is one thing that the Johns Hopkins lacrosse team is not afraid of. After all, they just wanna lax.

My Apologies to Mr. Phelps


I saw Bob Bowman at a swim meet last night, and after a starstruck moment, it occurred to me that I owed his best known prodigy an apology for a hasty, judgmental, and over-generalized statement. 
Dear Mr Phelps,
     I am sorry for judging you. I know that you are 23 years old. I personally disagree with your choice to smoke pot, but that is just how I feel. Really, you should be able to do what you want. I do think it is unfortunate that you have, perhaps unwillingly, been portrayed by the media as a full-time role model/ angel. I think the main source of controversy over your actions was not that as a twenty three year old you were smoking pot and hopping from frat party to frat party. It was probably that these actions were so unexpected from you, because of the standards, perhaps unfair or unreasonable, that people have for you. 
     I would like to commend you for not putting anyone's life in danger this time, as you did back in November of 2004. That in and of itself demonstrates growth and maturity. I am, however, worried about you. Clearly everywhere you go there are many people who are not really your friends. People who want to embarrass you, cause a scandal. I am also worried that perhaps the family, teasing, and self-image problems you had growing up, and have spoken candidly about in interviews and in your autobiography, might still be haunting you. 
     I am far from an expert on the subject of chemical dependancies or psychology, but I am a staunch believer that many times, there are emotional reasons for which someone might develop habits like you have taken up. It is not so much the one hit of the bong, but the monthly trips to Las Vegas, the partying with people who do not think twice about spoiling your reputation, that worries me. As harsh and critical as I have been of you, I am still here and I still care. You still represent my city, and you are still a role model to me. 
     But I worry that while you have clearly proven yourself a man under water, you are yet to come into your manhood above the surface. I wish that you didn't engage in some of the things you do, but I know others who have done similar things, and I do not love them any less. Personally, I wish you wouldn't do these things, but even more so, I wish your happiness. I wish you were content, and felt accomplished, deserving, self-assured, above the water. Maybe this is why other people are so upset, maybe not. I am disappointed, mostly, that you have not been able to do this thus far, or at least that is what I interpret your partying habits to suggest. By all means, have a good time, but please do it in a way that conveys maturity, and self-control. You do not have to break laws to be happy, but most of all you do not have to hang out with questionable people. 
     I know that I have not always stood by you in the most supporting way. Part of me is far too willing to piece together the DUIs, party rumors, and girlfriend stories to make a terrible person out of you. But in the end, I am still here, still talking about you, because I care. I think that whether or not something like this will happen again, you should not have to say that it will not. The problem lies in that your profession and your sponsorships are ones that represent a healthy lifestyle, and a maturity level, that are perhaps refuted, at least traditionally, by the recently circulating images of you. I think you should hold the reigns in establishing who you are and what people expect from you. But most of all, I hope it won't happen again because I hope that you can find things that make you you up here on land, although if that truly is something that makes you happy, go for it, in all seriousness.
My Apologies,
                Kate

05 February 2009

Spotted: Gossip Girl Fashion

   some of the best wardrobe ensembles to ever grace my television set, making their way from New York's Upper East Side, home of "Manhattan's elite." Miss Blair, S, V, Little J, and others really rock out to life, and take advantage of their parents' credit cards and their abundance of free-time. They manage to look like this and score perfect SATs at the same time; that's what I call multitasking. Here are some of the outfits that I've "xoxo'd" in the past two seasons.
dynamic duo
golden girls
lady in red
miss blair
honorable mention

04 February 2009

Man of the Year?

Besides Bruce, there could really only be one viable candidate.
  See? Even Rihanna wears him on her fingernails.